Integrating probabilistic, taxonomic and causal knowledge in abductive diagnosis
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose an abductive diagnosis theory that integrates probabilistic, causal and taxonomic knowledge. Probabilistic knowledge allows us to select the most likely explanation; causal knowledge allows us to make reasonable inde pendence assumptions; taxonomic knowledge allows causation to be modeled at different lev els of detail, and allows observations be de scribed in different levels of precision. Unlike most other approaches where a causal explanation is a hypothesis that one or more causative events occurred, we define an expla nation of a set of observations to be an occur rence of a chain of causation events. These cau sation events constitute a scenario where all the observations are true. We show that the prob abilities of the scenarios can be computed from the conditional probabilities of the causation events. Abductive reasoning is inherently complex even if only modest expressive power is allowed. However, our abduction algorithm is exponen tial only in the number of observations to be explained, and is polynomial in the size of the knowledge base. This contrasts with many other abduction procedures that are exponen tial in the size of the knowledge base.
منابع مشابه
Abductive, Causal, and Counterfactual Conditionals Under Incomplete Probabilistic Knowledge
We study abductive, causal, and non-causal conditionals in indicative and counterfactual formulations using probabilistic truth table tasks under incomplete probabilistic knowledge (N = 80). We frame the task as a probability-logical inference problem. The most frequently observed response type across all conditions was a class of conditional event interpretations of conditionals; it was follow...
متن کاملProbabilistic Extention to Realistic Abductive Reasoning Model
In this paper, we give method for probabilistic assignment to the Realistic Abduc-tive Reasoning Model, proposed in 1]. The knowledge is assumed to be represented in the form of causal chaining, namely, hyper-bipartite network. Hyper-bipartite network is the most generalized form of knowledge representation for which, so far, there has been no way of assigning the probability to the explanation...
متن کاملUsing Domain Knowledge to Select Solutions in Abductive Diagnosis
This paper presents a novel extension to abductive reasoning in causal nets, namely the use of domain knowledge to select among alternative diagnoses. We describe how preferences among multiple causes of a given state can be expressed in terms of causal nets, and how these preferences can be used to select among alternative diagnoses. We investigate this new extension by proving a number of pro...
متن کاملA Probabilistic Theory of Abductive Diagnostic Reasoning
In this paper, we present a probabilistic theory of abductive diagnostic reasoning. The domain knowledge is represented by a causal network. An explanation of a set of observations is a chain of causation events. These causation events constitute a scenario where all the observations can be observed. We deene the best explanation to be the most probable explanation. The underlying causal model ...
متن کاملA Probabilistic Model of Learning Fields in Islamic Economics and Finance
In this paper an epistemological model of learning fields of probabilistic events is formalized. It is used to explain resource allocation governed by pervasive complementarities as the sign of unity of knowledge. Such an episteme is induced epistemologically into interacting, integrating and evolutionary variables representing the problem at hand. The end result is the formalization of a p...
متن کامل